It seems to me that what we're lacking today in the "modern" West, and what the "primitive", dancing cultures you describe do not lack, is the capacity and will to do some ~thing~ (dance, ritual, etc.) together that has no first-order, direct value (financial or otherwise), and to treat this ~thing~ with the care and reverence needed to do it right. We are an atomized culture, so we don't do much together. And, we are a fundamentally irreverent culture, so what we do must always have some first-order, direct objective -- making money, staying healthy, etc. -- at the individual level. No higher-order values for us, please. Of course, much of the historical avant-garde reveled in irreverence, and the dismantling of old follies. The new avant-garde would need to be in reaction against our atomized, irreverent, first-order culture. How can we do things right, as if they really matter, without a sense of the sacred, without grounding in tradition? And, in doing so, how can we maintain an impish, exuberant good humor that mocks self-serious autocrats like Turkmenistan's deceased 'Head of the Turkmen' and France's long-deceased Sun King. No doubt, it will be a hard line for us to dance.
Dance also has scientifically validated "first-order, direct value" benefits - improved cognitive function, cardiovascular benefits, increased socialization - which could be used as rationalizations by those who need them as motivation.
In that alternate reality are you making boots? I know that’s probably not it. It’s probably some brand I’m not aware of. But god damn that would be pretty sweet, a guy named Justin wearing Justin boots, that he made! Way I figure it a guy like that might have an awful lot to dance for.
The paragraph on Wagner reminds of Anna Mikhailova's operatic aspiration (though not the de-Judaized part!) - particularly in her "Ultimate Game" combining football (a/k/a soccer to Americans) and opera. It is "not to make a performance of football players running around while singing Wagner", she notes, but where "Opera should learn from football how to inspire the happy intensity of feeling that you are present, as you watch teams playing with the ball. I am curious to see how football ACTIVITY can grow within the RULES OF OPERA...." She is talking about EXUBERANCE here.... https://mikhamikhailova.wixsite.com/annamikhailova/ultimategameopera
Ultimate Game is unrealized thus far, though her other project Trinity Opera has been realized, albeit with the misfortune -or perhaps it is better to take it as a timely exhortation for peace- to premier in Moscow the same week that Putin launched his "special military operation" in Ukraine, deploying another "Wagner"....
Enjoyed your essay, My wife (Fresno girl) and daughter took up ball room dance about five years ago. The dance floor is a great place to leave behind politics and dance off some the residual exuberance left over from 74 years of life.
All that cultural innovation, transgression, and play of the unmoored imagination...wasn't that in some sense synonymous with late capitalism, something that helped foster it? Thinking of Daniel Bell's Cultural Contradictions but also Rieff, here. As Robert Hughes asked: what happens when the shock of the new doesn't shock any more. No wonder sensitive souls in the late 19th c. wanted to escape Europe and go back to what they thought was the "primitive" (the subconcious, rather than the surpa-).
I think you're really onto something with this idea of 'burnout' in the 70s. Mark Fisher (citing Berardi): the world ended in 1976. Do you hear that in Miles Davis' 'In a Silent Way'?
Re-reading this İ was struck by how many times you use the word 'unconscious'. I wonder if that indicates the impasse Europe found itself after "killing God"? The only way to resist capitalism, rationalization and control (Hartmut Rosa) was to go downwards or backwards: to the 'primitive', the subconscious, as a way of staking a claim for the soul against the hypertrophy of the mind and the machine?
Ultimately, though, didn't that just feed into late capitalism which had to liberate desire? What if all that innovation and experimentation only further ensnared us? What if the frenzy/exuberance isn't just a natural phenomenon but actually a requirement and consequence of late capitalist development (production in all directions)? At the end, Brando asks, "Have you ever considered any true freedoms?"
""We call those echoes “art”, but this term marks out an anthropologically distinct, and likely unusual, ontological commitment to a nature-culture divide that all human societies by no means share. A more basic and universal account of what is going on might be suggested in the notion of exuberance.""
If we wish to play/dance then we can blur our categories by slashing them together, to hold in mind in order to unfrack our attention in a creative blur: art/rites/dance/rituals/religion/morallity/world/worlding/world-building/living/exuberance
This piece reminded me of the most exhilarating movie I’d seen in years, Gaspar Noe’s “Climax.” I was slightly stoned when I saw it, but I’m still fairly sure that it was, indeed, avant-garde, and was almost all about the promise of dance.
I'm a bit squeamish about Gaspar Noë ever since I saw Irréversible, though I recall loving his debut work, Seul contre tous. Maybe I'll work up the courage to watch Climax at some point.
You continue to inspire me. I am forced to examine my own work to be certain I am not merely parroting your perspective through the scrim of my own. Or perhaps I should simply stop the examination and be subsumed. In any case, many thanks.
It seems to me that what we're lacking today in the "modern" West, and what the "primitive", dancing cultures you describe do not lack, is the capacity and will to do some ~thing~ (dance, ritual, etc.) together that has no first-order, direct value (financial or otherwise), and to treat this ~thing~ with the care and reverence needed to do it right. We are an atomized culture, so we don't do much together. And, we are a fundamentally irreverent culture, so what we do must always have some first-order, direct objective -- making money, staying healthy, etc. -- at the individual level. No higher-order values for us, please. Of course, much of the historical avant-garde reveled in irreverence, and the dismantling of old follies. The new avant-garde would need to be in reaction against our atomized, irreverent, first-order culture. How can we do things right, as if they really matter, without a sense of the sacred, without grounding in tradition? And, in doing so, how can we maintain an impish, exuberant good humor that mocks self-serious autocrats like Turkmenistan's deceased 'Head of the Turkmen' and France's long-deceased Sun King. No doubt, it will be a hard line for us to dance.
Dance also has scientifically validated "first-order, direct value" benefits - improved cognitive function, cardiovascular benefits, increased socialization - which could be used as rationalizations by those who need them as motivation.
From the historical dance archives...
😉
https://youtu.be/UEdTCb8A5ug?si=719C4VSTEs0bRvu9
I think I know what that is -- afraid to look 😂❤️
This essay: Decidedly not phooey!
In that alternate reality are you making boots? I know that’s probably not it. It’s probably some brand I’m not aware of. But god damn that would be pretty sweet, a guy named Justin wearing Justin boots, that he made! Way I figure it a guy like that might have an awful lot to dance for.
Thanks! This might help clarify: https://www.justinboots.com
I see now, paired with a filthmonger's stache—lock up the women!
The paragraph on Wagner reminds of Anna Mikhailova's operatic aspiration (though not the de-Judaized part!) - particularly in her "Ultimate Game" combining football (a/k/a soccer to Americans) and opera. It is "not to make a performance of football players running around while singing Wagner", she notes, but where "Opera should learn from football how to inspire the happy intensity of feeling that you are present, as you watch teams playing with the ball. I am curious to see how football ACTIVITY can grow within the RULES OF OPERA...." She is talking about EXUBERANCE here.... https://mikhamikhailova.wixsite.com/annamikhailova/ultimategameopera
Ultimate Game is unrealized thus far, though her other project Trinity Opera has been realized, albeit with the misfortune -or perhaps it is better to take it as a timely exhortation for peace- to premier in Moscow the same week that Putin launched his "special military operation" in Ukraine, deploying another "Wagner"....
"Perhaps, one of these days, when we’re feeling really carefree, we’ll go out dancing."
I often recommend to people that they go out dancing. Works for me.
Enjoyed your essay, My wife (Fresno girl) and daughter took up ball room dance about five years ago. The dance floor is a great place to leave behind politics and dance off some the residual exuberance left over from 74 years of life.
Here's the more recent (and detailed) talk:
https://www.youtube.com/live/d9JrBe7sdk0?si=w_tCtr7abk--NZjg
Thanks, Justin. Need to print this out and read it since I invariably end up skimming online.
Thought you might like the second half of this (on modern dance. Starts around the 43 min mark. He also has a more recent video on dance):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHZFmnJVbhs
All that cultural innovation, transgression, and play of the unmoored imagination...wasn't that in some sense synonymous with late capitalism, something that helped foster it? Thinking of Daniel Bell's Cultural Contradictions but also Rieff, here. As Robert Hughes asked: what happens when the shock of the new doesn't shock any more. No wonder sensitive souls in the late 19th c. wanted to escape Europe and go back to what they thought was the "primitive" (the subconcious, rather than the surpa-).
I think you're really onto something with this idea of 'burnout' in the 70s. Mark Fisher (citing Berardi): the world ended in 1976. Do you hear that in Miles Davis' 'In a Silent Way'?
Best,
K.
Cool, thanks Khalid. A Miles Davis essay is on the way at some point!
Look forward to it!
Re-reading this İ was struck by how many times you use the word 'unconscious'. I wonder if that indicates the impasse Europe found itself after "killing God"? The only way to resist capitalism, rationalization and control (Hartmut Rosa) was to go downwards or backwards: to the 'primitive', the subconscious, as a way of staking a claim for the soul against the hypertrophy of the mind and the machine?
Ultimately, though, didn't that just feed into late capitalism which had to liberate desire? What if all that innovation and experimentation only further ensnared us? What if the frenzy/exuberance isn't just a natural phenomenon but actually a requirement and consequence of late capitalist development (production in all directions)? At the end, Brando asks, "Have you ever considered any true freedoms?"
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2004/dec/11/usa.marlonbrando
Thanks for the education/lead/reminder on Kant.
Also
""We call those echoes “art”, but this term marks out an anthropologically distinct, and likely unusual, ontological commitment to a nature-culture divide that all human societies by no means share. A more basic and universal account of what is going on might be suggested in the notion of exuberance.""
If we wish to play/dance then we can blur our categories by slashing them together, to hold in mind in order to unfrack our attention in a creative blur: art/rites/dance/rituals/religion/morallity/world/worlding/world-building/living/exuberance
https://whyweshould.substack.com/p/slash-and-burn-is-a-category-killer
https://whyweshould.substack.com/p/why-i-no-longer-arts-artifacts-into
I am not here to subscribe but exuberate.
This piece reminded me of the most exhilarating movie I’d seen in years, Gaspar Noe’s “Climax.” I was slightly stoned when I saw it, but I’m still fairly sure that it was, indeed, avant-garde, and was almost all about the promise of dance.
I'm a bit squeamish about Gaspar Noë ever since I saw Irréversible, though I recall loving his debut work, Seul contre tous. Maybe I'll work up the courage to watch Climax at some point.
You continue to inspire me. I am forced to examine my own work to be certain I am not merely parroting your perspective through the scrim of my own. Or perhaps I should simply stop the examination and be subsumed. In any case, many thanks.
Keep writing in your own voice, man, but don't be afraid to use that voice to channel others, sometimes. I certainly do!
Good idea, thanks Markku.